Were The Devastating California Wildfires Caused By Directed-Energy Weapons?

>At around 9:45 PM on Sunday October 8th, 2017, the Tubbs Fire began in Northern California. And by the time the sun came up, over 1,000 homes were destroyed.
>Videos and photographs show how this so-called forest fire seemed to spare the wild and somehow jumped from house to house. CNN reported that the so-called forest fire jumped to the freeway.
>Hundreds of photographs show cars with melted trails of aluminum alloys from what must have been an unprecedented amount of power.
>The average forest fire burns at 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit. Aluminum alloys will melt at temperatures between 1,200 and 2,000 degrees. But many of these cars were nowhere near a forest fire. Some cars were flipped over.
>The heat must have been intense. Not only was it able to melt aluminum alloy, but consistently every home that caught fire was leveled to white powdery ash in less than 12 hours.
>By October 31st, the Tubbs Fire had destroyed 5,643 buildings. PG&E (Pacific Gas and Electric) was found responsible for 16 of the fires; over $10 billion in damages. All of this while producing $1 billion a year in profits for the Rothschild Investment Group.
>PG&E warned the public that the fires would not just continue, but will grow larger every season. They warned their investors that future liability will force PG&E into bankruptcy. In June, utility officials told state lawmakers that they needed protection to survive the coming fire season. On August 31st, California state legislature passed a utility bailout bill to protect PG&E, its shareholders and Rothschild Investment.
>At sunrise on Thursday, November 8th, the Camp Fire wildfire began in California. It has all the same anomalies as the Tubbs Fire and is already twice as devastating.
>Many people are asking the same question: Is this an attack?

In 2003, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers admit to the development of directed-energy weapons and microwave technology. In 2017, Lockheed Martin shoots drones out of the sky with an invisible laser beam that burns them from the inside out.
>The technology exists. The evidence is there. But the motive?
>Perhaps it can be found in the United Nations “Agenda 21” where in certain areas of the country are proposed to be off limits to human use. It just so happens that these strange California fires seem to all be within the proposed “no human use” areas.
>New regulations of insurance policies are preventing homeowners from rebuilding. Meanwhile, they claim this is the new normal and are now claiming it is a phenomenon of global warming.
>One thing is for certain: The governor of California has already assured that the people will pay for all of the damages.

California burns for the following reasons:
1: Overkill environmentalism and the use of making tons of environmentally protected areas in viscinity of human activity areas as opposed to simply letting one large land mass be environmentally protected and the rest open to development.
2: The planting of the dangerous Australian Eucalyptus trees. These things caused fires in both Portugal and Israel and are an idiotic blight spread by the aussies.

3:Droughts caused by mismanagement of water resources.

This isn't some vast conspiracy of space lasers turning the frogs gay, this is a case of several bad and short sighted decisions of a government all having a disastrous consequence.


Pay attention to what development projects are happening, what areas are being targeted by fires, and what benefit California would have for burning the state strategically while milking federal funds.

Imagine they are the negro, suckling the welfare teet. They get very smart at ensuring the milk is flowing and can manipulate the system by its own rules. California has not only created this environment by stupid fucking laws to make their retarded citizens enjoy the beauty of nature (source: work with former cal fire guy) There was a town this guy worked by that firefighters VOLUNTEERED to come clean up and control burn. FOR FREE. They said no. Now the city will eventually go up in flames and all the old people will be charcoal. Even worse, why not compare the 2018/2016 county voting results map and the fires. I don't think it was directed energy weapons, because witnesses and liability. However, I do think the state plays a part in ensuring the ideal places get burned. Some CalAnon said something about a certain high speed railway path being burnt out to FEMA bucks pay for its construction. California is a sinking ship and the drowning rats desperately struggle to live by clawing at the rest of the country through the conduit of socialism.

Steel didn't turn to dust. Steel was in the mountain of debris that also filled the various BASEMENTS(that's plural) of the WTC towers, and the streets surrounding the buildings. Something that would NOT have happened under a controlled demolition, mind you because that is a science and the people that do it can drop a building like the WTC into its footprint with no rubble on the streets at all. You would know this if you know about demolitions at all.
The reason it fell so fast is because there was tens of thousands of tons of weight there, that suddenly broke free. What you and your mong buddies don't understand is, the energy released by those buildings falling was put into them by the months it took to build them. Every hot rivet contributed to some of this energy, little by little, as the building was constructed. It totally had more than enough potential energy to destroy itself just like that. This is best described by Newton's Third Law of Motion. You should understand this as instinct if you went to any decent school EVER.

Each one of those buildings had MASSIVE AMOUNTS of potential energy. In fact in demolitions, it's THIS VERY ENERGY that is harnessed and used to demolish the building, the explosives are merely used to cut specific supports to make the building fall a specific way. 
But setting these explosives takes months of prepwork and clearing of interior walls/etc. A building CANNOT be prepped for demo while occupied. Not possible. And especially not possible with tens of thousands of witnesses scurrying about.

You faggots watch too much MacGyver. Bet you think a lock can be picked with a pocket knife.

Richard Gage fumbling an interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArLe__a_VaY [Embed]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FolJSNVmCM [Embed]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1br_GaRFcI [Embed]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUH4oL4FsU8 [Embed]

steven jones and alex jones able to talk about 9/11 (((truth))) on cspan???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h50BgNpcYR8 [Embed]

birth of "muh space beams"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG3i-Ymm3Uc [Embed]

why is a (((truther))) attempting to cover up any sort of investigation/talk about such technology? interesting note that jones worked on EXACTLY this sort of technology privately with the fucking government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lASyX1SP2UM [Embed]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEWaV5JXRpo [Embed]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3YCYijh478 [Embed]

why do so many people who consider themselves (((truthers))) spend so much time attacking someone whos actually bringing court cases to the likes of NIST? one of which actually made it to the supreme court, who apparently can deny overseeing a case if they dont feel like it...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpLbzLzY9HY [Embed]